¹⁹ On the evening of that first day of the week, when the doors were locked, where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them, “Peace be with you.” ²⁰ When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples rejoiced when they saw the Lord. ²¹ Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, so I send you.” ²² And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the holy Spirit. ²³ Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained.”

²⁴ Thomas, called Didymus, one of the Twelve, was not with them when Jesus came. ²⁵ So the other disciples said to him, “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them, “Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands and put my finger into the nailmarks and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.” ²⁶ Now a week later his disciples were again inside and Thomas was with them. Jesus came, although the doors were locked, and stood in their midst and said, “Peace be with you.” ²⁷ Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here and see my hands, and bring your hand and put it into my side, and do not be unbelieving, but believe.” ²⁸ Thomas answered and said to him, “My Lord and my God!” ²⁹ Jesus said to him, “Have you come to believe because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.”

³⁰ Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples that are not written in this book. ³¹ But these are written that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through this belief you may have life in his name.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Easter Sunday evening and the disciples are hiding behind locked doors. Jesus walks through them, speaks peace, shows the wounds, breathes the Spirit, and gives the authority to forgive sins. Thomas misses all of it. When he hears what happened he says he will not believe without the same direct encounter the others had. A week later Jesus comes back specifically for him, offers the wounds, and Thomas responds with the highest confession in the Gospel. My Lord and my God. The prologue opened by declaring the Word was God. The main narrative closes with a man saying it directly to the risen Lord’s face. That arc is the whole Gospel. And then John tells the reader why he wrote it, so that you might believe what Thomas confessed, and through that belief receive the life Thomas received. The Gospel was written for this moment and for every reader who arrives at it without having seen.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

It is Easter Sunday evening and the disciples are behind locked doors, hiding in fear. They have received Mary Magdalene’s testimony and some have seen the empty tomb. The news has arrived and it has not yet become the thing they stand on, fearing further persecution from others. Jesus appears without the doors being opened, He is simply present. The resurrection body throughout the Gospel accounts occupies physical space, can be touched, eats food, and passes through locked doors without contradiction.

The first word Jesus speaks into that room is peace, and it carries more than a greeting. Isaiah 52 announces the messenger who brings good news of peace and declares that God reigns. Isaiah 53 says the punishment that brought us peace was upon the servant. The risen Jesus speaking peace into that locked room is the proclamation that what the servant died to accomplish has been achieved and is now being given away.

He shows them His hands and His side. The wounds are the identifying marks of continuity between the crucified body and the risen body. The resurrection does not erase the cross. The glorified body retains the marks of the passion, and the disciples’ joy at seeing them is the fulfillment of a specific promise Jesus made before His arrest in John 16, that their grief would turn to joy when they saw Him again and that no one would be able to take that joy from them.

The commission He gives is grounded in the deepest structure of the entire Gospel. As the Father has sent me, so I send you. John’s Gospel is built on the sending of the Son by the Father, and that sending now becomes both the model and the source of the disciples’ own mission. They are not sent with independent authority. They are sent the way the Son was sent, in dependence on the one who sends, carrying the message of the one who sends.

He breathes on them. The Greek verb John uses here, enephysesen, appears nowhere else in the New Testament. Its only other significant use in the Greek Bible is in Genesis 2:7, where God forms the first human from the dust of the ground and breathes into his nostrils the breath of life. The same verb, the same act. The risen Jesus breathing the Spirit on the disciples is a new creation act, a new Genesis. Ezekiel 37 is the second layer beneath this moment, the vision of the valley of dry bones where God commands the prophet to call the breath from the four winds to breathe into the slain so they might live. The Spirit Jesus breathes is the breath that raises the dead community to new life exactly as Ezekiel’s vision anticipated. The authority to forgive and retain sins that accompanies this breath is where the early Church tradition of going to reconciliation comes from. The early Church identifies as the institution of the sacrament of Penance, a juridical authority delegated by Jesus to the community He is forming.

Thomas is not present during all of this. When the others tell him they have seen the Lord his response has defined him for two thousand years. Unless he sees the wounds and touches them himself, he will not believe. They saw the hands and the side before they believed. He is asking for the same experience they had. The specific problem is not the demand for evidence, but the refusal to receive testimony as sufficient. The beloved disciple believed at the tomb. Mary believed when Jesus spoke her name. Thomas is placing himself outside the chain by which faith normally moves from one person to another.

A week later, on the eighth day, Jesus appears again. In Jewish reckoning the eighth day follows the completion of the seven-day week and begins a new cycle. The early Church gathered on the first day of the week as the day of resurrection, understanding it as the eighth day, the day of eschatological renewal. Jesus appears on the same day of the week specifically for Thomas, and He comes with exactly what Thomas demanded. The invitation to touch is given and is followed by a proclamation to the Lord for him to believe.

My Lord and my God. That confession is the highest Christological statement in the entire Gospel. Kyrios, Lord, is the Greek rendering of the divine name YHWH throughout the Septuagint. Theos, God, is the direct predicate of divinity. Thomas is not confessing a prophet or a Messiah in the political sense. He is addressing the risen Jesus with the names that belong to God alone. And the personal pronouns, my Lord and my God, make clear this is not an abstract theological proposition. It is a declaration of personal relationship addressed directly to a person.

John 1:1 opens the Gospel with the narrator’s declaration that the Word was God. John 20:28 closes the main narrative with a disciple’s personal confession of the same truth spoken directly to the risen Lord. The arc the Gospel has been drawing from the prologue arrives at its destination in Thomas’s mouth.

The beatitude Jesus speaks over those who have not seen and have believed is addressed to every reader from the first century forward. It does not diminish Thomas’s faith. It elevates the faith of those who will come after, whose belief rests entirely on testimony and the work of the Spirit rather than on direct physical encounter. These things are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life in His name. The Gospel is not primarily a historical record. It is a document written with a specific destination in mind, the confession Thomas made, and through that confession the life that Thomas received.

Reflection Question

Is your faith resting on testimony you have received and chosen to believe, or are you still waiting for the kind of encounter that removes all doubt before you commit?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

⁹ When he had risen, early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had driven seven demons. ¹⁰ She went and told his companions who were mourning and weeping. ¹¹ When they heard that he was alive and had been seen by her, they did not believe.

¹² After this he appeared in another form to two of them walking along on their way to the country. ¹³ They returned and told the others; but they did not believe them either.

¹⁴ But later, as the eleven were at table, he appeared to them and rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart because they had not believed those who saw him after he had been raised. ¹⁵ He said to them, “Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to every creature.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Three people brought testimony about the risen Jesus. Three times it was rejected. Then Jesus appeared, named their hardness of heart, placed it in the oldest pattern of human resistance to God in Scripture, and sent them anyway. He did not wait for repentance or improved character. The commission followed the rebuke directly because being sent is part of how God forms the people he sends. It has always worked this way. Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Peter, all commissioned before they were ready, all formed by the sending itself. The scope of what they were given is the widest in any Gospel. The whole world. Every creature. The people carrying it are the same ones who hours earlier refused to believe the women who told them the tomb was empty. We are an extension of that same commission, sent in our own imperfection, formed by the going.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Before entering this passage it is worth noting some historical points around it. Mark 16:9-20 does not appear in the earliest Greek manuscripts of the Gospel. The oldest manuscripts end at verse 8, with the women fleeing the tomb in fear. The longer ending was added in the early centuries and draws on the resurrection appearances recorded in Luke and John, compressing them into a single sequence. Its inclusion was affirmed by the Council of Trent and is included in the NAB and NABRE translations with a note about its textual history. What it contains is consistent with the apostolic tradition.

Three times testimony about the risen Jesus is brought to the disciples and three times it is rejected. Mark’s compressed form makes the pattern visible in a way the longer accounts do not, because the surrounding narrative has been removed and the refusal is left standing alone. Mary Magdalene comes first and this Gospel identifies her not by her devotion or her standing but by her history. Out of her Jesus had driven seven demons. Seven in the Hebrew canon is the number of completeness. She had been in a state of total bondage and was completely freed. The first witness to the resurrection is a woman defined entirely by her deliverance, not by her credentials. She brings her testimony to the disciples, but they do not believe her.

Two disciples come next, the Emmaus account reduced to a single sentence. Mark notes that Jesus appeared to them in another form, en hetera morphe, a phrase that does not appear in Luke’s fuller account. The word morphe is the same word Paul uses in Philippians 2 for the form of God Christ possessed before the Incarnation and the form of a servant He took on in it. The resurrection body is a new form, continuous with the crucified body and transformed beyond it. These two disciples return with their testimony and the others do not believe them either. The key note here is that these are two men, which should have carried legal weight for first century Jews.

When Jesus appears to the eleven directly He rebukes them before anything else. The rebuke names two things, apistia and sklerokardia, unbelief and hardness of heart. Hardness of heart carries a specific weight in the biblical tradition. In Exodus it is Pharaoh’s defining characteristic, the repeated obstacle to Israel’s liberation. In Deuteronomy and Jeremiah, God commands Israel to circumcise their hearts, to remove the hardness that prevents genuine hearing. In Ezekiel 36, God promises to remove the heart of stone and replace it with a heart of flesh. Jesus applying this language to the eleven is not a casual accusation. He is placing their refusal inside the deepest pattern of human resistance to God in the Old Testament. They had sufficient testimony. Two credible witnesses had come to them. The problem was not the quality of the evidence. It was the will to receive it.

What follows the rebuke is the commission. The sequence of events is important. Jesus does not wait for the eleven to repent, to demonstrate improved character, or to articulate a satisfying explanation for why they rejected what they were told. He rebukes them and then sends them. The commission does not follow the completion of their formation. It is part of how the formation happens.

This pattern runs through every major commission in Scripture. Moses is sent after fleeing Egypt as a fugitive. Isaiah is commissioned immediately after confessing he is a man of unclean lips. Jeremiah protests that he is too young before the word of the Lord overrides his objection. Peter says depart from me, for I am a sinful man, and Jesus tells him to follow. The commission always arrives before the commissioned person is ready, because being sent is one of the primary means by which God forms the people He sends.

The scope of what the eleven are sent to do is the widest formulation of the Great Commission in any of the Gospels. Matthew sends them to all nations. Luke sends them to the ends of the earth. Mark sends them into the whole world to proclaim the Gospel to every creature. That final phrase, to every creature, to all creation, is unique to Mark. Paul writes in Romans 8 that creation itself is groaning and waiting in eager longing for the revelation of the children of God. The proclamation that goes to every creature is consistent with the cosmic scope of what the resurrection has set in motion.

The Gospel is not only the restoration of human beings. It is the beginning of the restoration of all things, and the people commissioned to carry it are the same people who, hours earlier, refused to believe the women who told them the tomb was empty. We are an extension of this commission. Jesus made it clear in His sermon on the mount that we were meant to be the light of the world. A light that could not be hidden. In Acts, we see that this is how the earliest followers behaved, “those who were scattered went about preaching the word.” For us today, we can follow this model, spreading the Word, and being that light that guides others to the Lord.

Reflection Question

Is there something God has been placing before you that you have been waiting to feel ready for before you accept it?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹ After this, Jesus revealed himself again to his disciples at the Sea of Tiberias. He revealed himself in this way. ² Together were Simon Peter, Thomas called Didymus, Nathanael from Cana in Galilee, Zebedee’s sons, and two others of his disciples. ³ Simon Peter said to them, “I am going fishing.” They said to him, “We also will come with you.” So they went out and got into the boat, but that night they caught nothing. ⁴ When it was already dawn, Jesus was standing on the shore; but the disciples did not realize that it was Jesus. ⁵ Jesus said to them, “Children, have you caught anything to eat?” They answered him, “No.” ⁶ So he said to them, “Cast the net over the right side of the boat and you will find something.” So they cast it, and were not able to pull it in because of the number of fish. ⁷ So the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, “It is the Lord.” When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he tucked in his garment, for he was lightly clad, and jumped into the sea. ⁸ The other disciples came in the boat, for they were not far from shore, only about a hundred yards, dragging the net with the fish. ⁹ When they climbed out on shore, they saw a charcoal fire with fish on it and bread. ¹⁰ Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish you just caught.” ¹¹ So Simon Peter went over and dragged the net ashore full of one hundred fifty-three large fish. Even though there were so many, the net was not torn. ¹² Jesus said to them, “Come, have breakfast.” And none of the disciples dared to ask him, “Who are you?” because they realized it was the Lord. ¹³ Jesus came over and took the bread and gave it to them, and in like manner the fish. ¹⁴ This was now the third time Jesus was revealed to his disciples after being raised from the dead.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

They had seen the risen Jesus twice and received the commission and they went fishing anyway. They worked through the dark and came up empty. At dawn a voice from the shore told them to cast on the other side and the net filled past the point of hauling in. The beloved disciple recognized him first. Peter jumped into the water. When they reached the shore the fire was already going and the food was already there. He had been providing before they arrived. He took bread and gave it to them, took fish and gave it to them, the same gesture as the feeding of the five thousand and the Last Supper. The risen Lord of heaven and earth served breakfast on a beach to the people who had abandoned him. None of them asked who he was. They knew. And the net did not tear.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Peter announces he is going fishing and the others follow him. They have seen the risen Jesus twice, received the commission, and are back in a boat on the lake where Jesus first called them. Whether Peter’s decision comes from restlessness or resignation, this is an echo of Luke 5, the original calls, where Peter and the others had fished all night and caught nothing before Jesus told them to cast the net and the catch overwhelmed the boat.

The night of failed fishing carries the same theological weight it carries everywhere in John’s Gospel. Night is the consistent marker of absence, of effort disconnected from the source of life. Judas walked out into the night after receiving the morsel. The disciples working through the darkness and coming up empty is John’s image of what ministry without the risen Jesus produces, regardless of expertise or effort.

Jesus appears on the shore at dawn, at the transition from darkness to light, consistent with John’s light theology throughout the Gospel. The disciples do not recognize Him, following the pattern of every resurrection appearance. He calls them children, paidia, the same intimate diminutive He used at the Last Supper in John 13 when He told them He was leaving. He addresses them now with the same word on the other side of everything that has happened since. He instructs them to cast the net on the right side of the boat and the catch is so large they cannot haul it in. The beloved disciple recognizes Jesus first, as he did at the empty tomb. Peter tucks in his garment and throws himself into the water.

The 153 fish have generated more commentary than almost any other detail in John’s Gospel. Jerome recorded that Greek zoologists of the ancient world had catalogued 153 species of fish, which would make the catch a symbol of the universal reach of the apostolic mission, every kind gathered in. Whether that reading can be established from the text or not, the Gospel emphasizes what accompanies the number. The net does not tear. In Luke 5, the first miraculous catch, the nets began to break and the boats began to sink. Here the net holds under the weight of the full catch. The first catch preceded the call and the community was not yet formed. This catch follows the resurrection and the commission. The net that holds even under 153 fish is the image of a Church that will gather from every nation without breaking under the strain.

When the disciples reach the shore they find a charcoal fire already burning with fish on it and bread beside it. The word John uses for charcoal fire, anthrakia, appears only twice in his entire Gospel. The first time was in John 18, where Peter stood warming himself at a charcoal fire in the courtyard of the high priest and denied Jesus three times. John does not use that specific word carelessly. He is signaling that what is about to happen on this shore is the answer to what happened in that courtyard. Peter denied Jesus beside one charcoal fire, but will be restored beside another. The two fires, one in Jerusalem at the arrest and one in Galilee at the breakfast, are the two poles of a single arc that Jesus is about to close.

Jesus already has fish on the fire before the disciples arrive with their catch. He has been providing before they reach the shore with what they have caught. The invitation He extends is warm and entirely unguarded. The risen Lord of heaven and earth is serving a meal on a beach. When He takes the bread and gives it to them, takes the fish and gives it to them, the gesture mirrors the feeding of the five thousand and the Last Supper.

None of the disciples ask who He is. They know it is the Lord, but the knowing operates differently than ordinary recognition. The resurrection body is real, the wounds are real, the fish is real, the bread is real, and it is all beyond the categories available to them. Their silence is not confusion, rather a particular kind of awe that comes from being in the presence of something you know but cannot fully contain. The Gospel notes that this is the third appearance to the disciples since the resurrection. Three denials. Three appearances. The third is the one that sets up what comes next, the restoration of the man who denied Him three times beside a fire exactly like this one.

A key takeaway is that the Lord provides. Even here, the disciples who were imperfect are provided for and loved deeply. This same love, the exact same perfect love, applies to each and every one of us. We will be provided for by a God that loves us. We are loved in a perfect way that is equal to the love of those that physically walked alongside Jesus, equal to those invited to have breakfast with Jesus that day.

Reflection Question

Where in your life have you been working through the dark and coming up empty, and have you heard the voice from the shore yet?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

³⁶ While they were still speaking about this, he stood in their midst and said to them, “Peace be with you.” ³⁷ But they were startled and terrified and thought that they were seeing a ghost. ³⁸ Then he said to them, “Why are you troubled? And why do questions arise in your hearts? ³⁹ Look at my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me and see, because a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you can see I have.” ⁴⁰ And as he said this, he showed them his hands and his feet. ⁴¹ While they were still incredulous for joy and were amazed, he asked them, “Have you anything here to eat?” ⁴² They gave him a piece of baked fish; ⁴³ he took it and ate it in front of them.

⁴⁴ He said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the law of Moses and in the prophets and psalms must be fulfilled.” ⁴⁵ Then he opened their minds to understand the scriptures. ⁴⁶ And he said to them, “Thus it is written that the Messiah would suffer and rise from the dead on the third day ⁴⁷ and that repentance, for the forgiveness of sins, would be preached in his name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem. ⁴⁸ You are witnesses of these things. ⁴⁹ And behold I am sending the promise of my Father upon you; but stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high.”

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

He appeared in the room without entering it, spoke peace into a space still processing the Emmaus testimony, and then spent the rest of the evening dismantling every objection. He showed the wounds. He ate the fish. He opened their minds to read the scriptures the way the scriptures had always been meant to be read. He gave them a commission that reached back to Abraham and forward to every nation. And then he told them to stay in the city and wait. They had seen everything. They had the words. They did not yet have what was needed to carry any of it. The Spirit is not optional enhancement. It is the equipment without which the mission cannot begin. The instruction to wait is not a delay. It is the shape of obedience before the movement starts.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

The Emmaus disciples have just finished recounting their encounter when Jesus appears in the room. The testimony is still fresh, the room is still processing it and Jesus arrives before anyone can debate or dismiss what has been said. He does not enter through a door, He is simply present. This is in keeping with His appearance and disappearance at other points throughout the resurrection story.

His first words are peace be with you, and in this moment those words carry more weight than the standard Hebrew greeting they resemble. Isaiah 52 announces the messenger who proclaims peace and declares that God reigns. Isaiah 53 says the punishment that brought us peace was upon the servant. The risen Jesus speaking peace into that room is the announcement that what Isaiah’s servant died to accomplish has been achieved.

The disciples assume they are seeing a ghost, He has just appeared after all. The ghost interpretation is their minds producing the most rational explanation available for what they are witnessing, but it is wrong. This Gospel shows us that from the beginning, the resurrection was not the product of people who were already convinced. It was an encounter that caught them entirely off guard.

Jesus addresses the assumption directly with three forms of evidence. He shows them His hands and feet, He invites them to touch Him, and then He asks for something to eat. The piece of baked fish consumed in front of the disciples is Luke’s most concrete argument for bodily resurrection. Ghosts or visions do not eat. The request for food is not incidental. Acts 10:41 specifies that the apostolic witnesses ate and drank with Jesus after He rose from the dead, and those shared meals as part of the testimony itself, not background detail. The note that the disciples were incredulous for joy is one of the most precise psychological observations. They are not disbelieving out of hostility or skepticism. The experience is simply too large for their frameworks to absorb. It is too good to be true in the most literal sense.

When Jesus opens their minds to understand the scriptures, Luke uses the same verb he used twice in the Emmaus account, dianoigo, to open. He used it when the disciples’ eyes were opened at the breaking of the bread, and when they described how Jesus opened the scriptures to them on the road. Three uses of the same word in the same chapter, each describing the same divine act. The disciples had read the scriptures before the resurrection. They could not read them in a way that made sense of what had just happened until the risen Jesus opened their minds. The resurrection is the interpretive key that unlocks what the entire canon was pointing toward. Without it, the scriptures are a collection of promises without a fulfillment. With it, they become a single coherent narrative.

Jesus identifies all three divisions of the Hebrew canon, the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms as the writings, the full Tanakh, and says all of it was pointing to what has occurred. The pattern of the Messiah suffering and rising on the third day is not drawn from a single text. It is embedded across the whole. Hosea 6 speaks of being raised up on the third day. Psalm 16 says God will not let His holy one see corruption. Isaiah 53 promises that the servant who makes his life an offering will see his offspring and prolong his days. Jonah’s three days in the depths is the sign Jesus Himself cited in Matthew 12. The third day is the fulfillment of a pattern the scriptures had been building for centuries.

The commission Jesus gives reaches back further than the resurrection. When He says repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached to all nations, He is placing that commission inside the promise God made to Abraham in Genesis 12, that in him all the families of the earth would be blessed, and the commission Isaiah gave the servant in chapter 49, to be a light to the nations so that God’s salvation would reach the ends of the earth. The universal scope of the mission is not a new development. It is the fulfillment of what God announced to Abraham and what the prophets had been carrying ever since.

The instruction to stay in the city is as important as the commission to go. The disciples are witnesses. They have seen everything. They have the commission. But they do not yet have what they need to carry it out. The Spirit is the equipment for the mission, not an optional enhancement, and it has not yet come. Joel 2 promised that God would pour out His Spirit on all flesh, and Peter will stand up at Pentecost and announce that what Joel described is what is currently happening. The risen Jesus is pointing forward to that day as the necessary next event. The mission cannot begin in human effort. It waits for what the Father promised, and then it goes to every nation.

This is an important part of discernment for ourselves and something we saw in the Old Testament between David and Saul. We must remember that we are called to do the will of God. Even something we may personally feel is furthering the Word may not be what we are called to do at the time. David was called to be King, but not to remove Saul to make that happen. He knew his place, but that it was to be done according to God’s will. The disciples were called to go forth and do great things, but to have restraint, only going once the spirit came to them – on the timeline of God, not themselves.

Reflection Question

Is there something God has commissioned you to do that you are hesitating on? Is there something you are doing that He is not calling you to do?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹³ Now that very day two of them were going to a village seven miles from Jerusalem called Emmaus, ¹⁴ and they were conversing about all the things that had occurred. ¹⁵ And it happened that while they were conversing and debating, Jesus himself drew near and walked with them, ¹⁶ but their eyes were prevented from recognizing him. ¹⁷ He asked them, “What are you discussing as you walk along?” They stopped, looking downcast. ¹⁸ One of them, named Cleopas, said to him in reply, “Are you the only visitor to Jerusalem who does not know of the things that have taken place there in these days?” ¹⁹ And he replied to them, “What sort of things?” They said to him, “The things that happened to Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, ²⁰ how our chief priests and rulers both handed him over to a sentence of death and crucified him. ²¹ But we were hoping that he would be the one to redeem Israel; and besides all this, it is now the third day since this took place. ²² Some women from our group, however, have astounded us: they were at the tomb early in the morning ²³ and did not find his body; they came back and reported that they had indeed seen a vision of angels who announced that he was alive. ²⁴ Then some of those with us went to the tomb and found things just as the women had described, but him they did not see.” ²⁵ And he said to them, “Oh, how foolish you are! How slow of heart to believe all that the prophets spoke! ²⁶ Was it not necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” ²⁷ Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them what referred to him in all the scriptures. ²⁸ As they approached the village to which they were going, he gave the impression that he was going on farther. ²⁹ But they urged him, “Stay with us, for it is nearly evening and the day is almost over.” So he went in to stay with them. ³⁰ And it happened that, while he was with them at table, he took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them. ³¹ With that their eyes were opened and they recognized him, but he vanished from their sight. ³² Then they said to each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he spoke to us on the way and opened the scriptures to us?” ³³ So they set out at once and returned to Jerusalem where they found gathered together the eleven and those with them ³⁴ who were saying, “The Lord has truly been raised and has appeared to Simon!” ³⁵ Then the two recounted what had taken place on the way and how he was made known to them in the breaking of the bread.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

They were walking away. The resurrection had already been announced and they were headed in the opposite direction, toward a village of no significance, carrying the past tense of abandoned hope. A stranger joined them, rebuked their slowness, and showed them how the entire Hebrew canon had been pointing toward what they thought was a defeat. They did not recognize him until he broke the bread, using the same four verbs Luke recorded at the multiplication of loaves and at the Last Supper. The moment he was recognized he vanished. They sat with that for a moment and then asked each other whether their hearts had not been burning the whole time. Then they got up and walked seven miles back to Jerusalem in the dark. The resurrection does not produce rest. It produces return and proclamation.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Two disciples are walking away from Jerusalem on the day the resurrection has already been announced. The women have reported the empty tomb and these two are heading in the opposite direction, seven miles toward a village of no significance, on the most significant day in human history. The direction they are walking is not just geographical; it is the direction of abandoned hope.

Their summary of Jesus when the stranger joins them is an interesting point. They describe Him as a prophet mighty in deed and word. That description is accurate and it is not enough, especially considering their proximity to Jesus. Prophet is the category the crowds had used after the raising of the widow’s son at Nain, the same category some applied at the triumphal entry. It is true as far as it goes, but we can see that they have doubts. They are headed away and say that they were hoping that He would be the one to redeem Israel. The past tense is the grammar of a future that is no longer available to them. The word they use for redeem, lytrousthai, draws directly on the Exodus vocabulary of God ransoming Israel from Egypt. They expected a political and national deliverance. They got a crucifixion. In their framework these two things cannot both be true at once.

Jesus’ rebuke is sharp. Foolish and slow of heart are not gentle corrections. The problem He identifies is not that they lacked information. They had the scriptures. The problem is that they had not read them in a way that prepared them for a suffering Messiah. What follows is the earliest description of what the Church later calls typological interpretation, Jesus showing them beginning with Moses and moving through all the prophets how the entire Hebrew canon had been pointing toward what just occurred. The specific texts are not recorded. Luke preserves the method and withholds the content, which means every reader is invited to make the same journey, to go back to the scriptures and read them in light of the risen Christ.

The word Jesus uses for the necessity of the Messiah’s suffering, edei, is one of this Gospels most theologically significant terms. It is used throughout the Gospel for the divine necessity of Jesus’ mission. What happened on the cross was not a tragedy God permitted, but a path God had always designated. Suffering is the road to glory, and the scriptures had been saying so the whole time.

As they approach Emmaus, Jesus gives the impression He is continuing on. He does not force Himself into the house, but waits to be invited. Their urging Him to stay is the invitation that opens what follows. When He sits at table with them He takes bread, says the blessing, breaks it, and gives it to them. Those four verbs, took, blessed, broke, gave, appear in precisely the same sequence at the multiplication of the loaves in Luke 9 and at the Last Supper in Luke 22. The Gospel of Luke uses the sequence three times to establish a pattern. The recognition occurs at the moment the Eucharistic action is performed. Their eyes are opened and they know Him, and then He vanishes.

The disappearance at the moment of recognition is consistent with every resurrection appearance in the Gospels. The risen Jesus is not subject to ordinary physical presence. He appears and withdraws as He chooses, and the recognition does not require continued visibility. What He has opened cannot be closed again by His absence.

Their retrospective question to each other is the passage’s most enduring line. The burning had been happening the whole time. The Word had been working before the meal completed what the Word had begun. They rise that same hour and walk the seven miles back to Jerusalem. It is evening and they had walked seven miles on uneven surfaces. The resurrection encounter does not produce rest, it produces immediate return and proclamation. When they arrive they find the eleven already gathered and reporting that the Lord has appeared to Simon. The Emmaus disciples add their testimony and two independent streams of witness converge in the same room on the same night. The resurrection is no longer a single report. It is the convergence of multiple witnesses who have encountered the same person from different directions and arrived at the same declaration.

This shows us that Jesus can come and go as He pleases, and that we may not always recognize the significance of what is happening in the exact moment it happens. Everyone will respond differently to these encounters as they happen. the disciples at Emmaus were not less loved for their slowness to realize or believe. Jesus walked with them anyway and opened their eyes when the time was right. Coming to know the Lord is not a race and there are no extra points for getting there first. That being said, we should work to ensure our hearts are open to receive the Lord, for the sooner we experience this the longer we have to live in the fullness that is true connection with God.

Reflection Question

Is there a place in your life where Jesus has been walking with you and working in you that you have not yet recognized yet?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹¹ But Mary stayed outside the tomb weeping. And as she wept, she bent over into the tomb ¹² and saw two angels in white sitting there, one at the head and one at the feet where the body of Jesus had been. ¹³ And they said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping?” She said to them, “They have taken my Lord, and I don’t know where they laid him.” ¹⁴ When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus there, but did not know it was Jesus. ¹⁵ Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?” She thought it was the gardener and said to him, “Sir, if you carried him away, tell me where you laid him, and I will take him.” ¹⁶ Jesus said to her, “Mary!” She turned and said to him in Hebrew, “Rabbouni,” which means Teacher. ¹⁷ Jesus said to her, “Stop holding on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am going to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’” ¹⁸ Mary of Magdala went and announced to the disciples, “I have seen the Lord,” and what he told her.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Peter and the beloved disciple came, saw, and went home. Mary stayed. She had no answer and she would not leave without one. She is looking for a body and finds a person. She does not recognize him by sight. She recognizes him by voice, by the single word he speaks in the way only he speaks it. The Good Shepherd calls his own by name and they know his voice. That promise becomes literal in a garden at dawn with one word spoken in Hebrew. He sends her to announce what she has seen, not to the world but to the brothers, and she goes. The one who stayed when everyone else left becomes the first voice of the Gospel’s greatest claim.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Peter and the beloved disciple came, saw, and went home. Mary stays at the tomb. She has no answer yet and she will not leave without one. She was there when Jesus died, was there at the burial, and is the last one standing at the empty tomb while the disciples have already returned to their homes. The verb John uses for her weeping, klaiousa, is the same word used for the mourning at Lazarus’s tomb in John 11, where Jesus arrived and was deeply troubled by the grief He encountered.

When she bends down into the tomb she sees two angels, one seated at the head and one at the feet where the body had been. Their positioning carries a specific resonance for anyone formed in Israel’s scriptures. In Exodus 25, God instructs Moses to place two cherubim on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant, one at each end, facing each other. The mercy seat was the holiest point in Israel’s worship, the place where God’s presence dwelt and where atonement was made. The two angels positioned at the head and feet of where Jesus had lain signal that the empty tomb is the new mercy seat, the place where divine presence and human need meet in a way the Ark could only anticipate.

The angels ask Mary why she is weeping and she gives the same answer she gave Peter and the beloved disciple. Someone has taken the body. The presence of angels has not shifted her framework. She is so deep in grief that even the supernatural does not register as significant. She turns and sees Jesus standing there and does not recognize Him. John gives no explanation for this, and none of the resurrection appearances in the Gospels produce immediate recognition. The disciples on the road to Emmaus walk with Jesus for hours without knowing Him. The disciples on the shore of Galilee do not recognize Him at first. The resurrection body is real and physical, but perception of it operates differently than ordinary sight.

She assumes He is the gardener. The word John uses here, ho kepouros, appears nowhere else in the New Testament. The detail is humanly plausible and theologically loaded. In Genesis 2, the first human was placed in a garden to tend it. In Genesis 3, the rupture between God and humanity began in a garden. Jesus was arrested in a garden. He was buried in a garden. The resurrection happens in a garden. This event has been drawing the full arc of the garden across human history, and the one Mary mistakes for the gardener is, in the deepest sense, exactly that. He is the new Adam, tending the garden of the new creation, closing the circle that opened in Eden.

Then He speaks her name. One word, in Hebrew, in the voice she knows. Everything turns on this moment. Jesus had said in John 10 that the Good Shepherd calls his own sheep by name and they know his voice. Mary does not recognize Him by sight. She recognizes Him by the particular way He speaks the one word that belongs to her. The promise of John 10 becomes literal at this moment. Her response, Rabbouni, is Aramaic for my teacher, carrying more warmth and personal devotion than the English translation conveys. It is the word of someone who has found not just a teacher but the person who defined their entire understanding of the world.

Jesus immediately redirects her. The instruction not to hold on to Him is not a prohibition on touch. The Greek construction indicates she is already holding on and He is telling her to stop. The reason He gives is not that contact is forbidden but that the relationship she is trying to secure through physical presence is about to be transformed into something closer. The ascension is not a departure that ends what they have. It is the next stage of a relationship that will no longer depend on physical proximity. Thomas will be explicitly invited to touch Jesus’ wounds later in this same chapter. The issue is not contact, rather clinging to the present moment as if it were the final destination.

The message He sends through her introduces language that has not appeared in this Gospel before this moment. Throughout the Gospel Jesus spoke of the Father as His Father in ways that indicated a unique relationship. Now He says my Father and your Father, my God and your God. The structure mirrors Ruth 1:16, where Ruth declares to Naomi your people shall be my people and your God my God, a declaration of total incorporation into a belonging that was not originally hers. The disciples are being drawn into the relationship Jesus has with the Father, not as equals in nature but as participants in the same love.

Mary goes and announces to the disciples that she has seen the Lord. She does not report an empty tomb or describe folded linen. She proclaims an encounter with a risen person. She is the first to say it, and the Church has recognized what that means. Augustine called her Apostle to the Apostles, sent by Jesus Himself to announce the resurrection to those He would send to the world. The one who stayed when everyone else left became the first voice of the Gospel’s greatest claim.

Mary would not have been a reliable witness under first century Jewish laws. Jesus chose her based on relationship, not on what would have been expected. If it were expected we would have seen the message carried by two men. The point of this is that Jesus calls His own in any way He wishes. The importance comes from our relationship with the Lord, not our relationship with the world. We should frame our actions this way, even today, choosing the Lord over the world. Remember, we are called to be like Mary in the sense that we proclaim the word to those we encounter.

Reflection Question

Is there a place in your faith where you have stopped staying, stopped waiting, stopped refusing to leave without an answer?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

⁸ Then they went away quickly from the tomb, fearful yet overjoyed, and ran to announce this to his disciples. ⁹ And behold, Jesus met them on their way and greeted them. They approached, embraced his feet, and did him homage. ¹⁰ Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go tell my brothers to go to Galilee, and there they will see me.”

¹¹ While they were going, some of the guard went into the city and told the chief priests all that had happened. ¹² They assembled with the elders and took counsel; then they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, ¹³ telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came by night and stole him while we were asleep.’ ¹⁴ And if this gets to the ears of the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” ¹⁵ The soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has circulated among the Jews to the present day.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

The women leave the tomb carrying fear and great joy at the same time because both are the honest response to something that has shattered every available category. Jesus meets them on the road and they take hold of his feet. The physical contact is not incidental. Paul will later argue in 1 Corinthians 15 that if the resurrection is not bodily it is nothing at all. Then Jesus sends a message to the disciples, men who fled and denied him and were nowhere near the tomb, and calls them his brothers. Psalm 22 moves from the desolation of the cross to the vindicated sufferer proclaiming God’s name to his brothers. That arc closes here. The title is not earned. It is given to the ones who did not earn it, which is the only way grace works. The Gospel ends where it began, in Galilee, with the unlikely people in the overlooked place, carrying news that changes everything.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

The women leave carrying fear and great joy simultaneously. Both are the honest response to an encounter with something that has shattered every available category. The appropriate reaction to the in-breaking of God into human history is not calm. Jesus meets them on the road and they take hold of His feet. The physical contact matters theologically. This is the same body that was sealed in the tomb, but can be embraced and held. Paul will later argue in 1 Corinthians 15 that if the resurrection is not bodily it is nothing at all. This points to the fact that without a real resurrection the entire Christian proclamation falls apart. The women hold His feet before anyone has written a word about what resurrection means.

The commission Jesus gives carries the word that reorients everything that preceded it. He calls the disciples His brothers. Psalm 22 is the foundation beneath this. It is the psalm Jesus quoted from the cross, the one that opens in desolation, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me, and ends with the vindicated sufferer proclaiming God’s name to his brothers in the great assembly. The movement of that psalm is from abandonment to brotherhood, from the cross to the community gathered on the other side of it. Jesus calling these particular men brothers, men who fled and denied and were nowhere near the tomb, is the completion of that arc. The title is not earned, it is given precisely to the ones who did not earn it, which is the only way grace works.

The Galilee instruction closes the narrative circle Matthew has been drawing since chapter 4. Jesus called His first disciples there beside the sea, in the region the religious establishment had long dismissed as peripheral. The great commission that follows in verses 16 through 20 will be given on a mountain in Galilee. Matthew’s Gospel ends where it began, in the place no one expected, with the people who failed Him being gathered back and sent forward. The geography is not incidental. God has consistently chosen the peripheral and the unlikely as the location of His decisive acts, and Matthew has been making that case since the genealogy in chapter 1.

What the chief priests do with the same morning is worth examining less for its irony and more for what it reveals about how people respond to evidence when something is at stake. The authorities who sealed the tomb and took every precaution against the claim of resurrection find themselves paying soldiers to provide an alternative account. The explanation they settle on, that sleeping guards failed to notice disciples removing a body, was recognized even in antiquity as incoherent. Justin Martyr and Tertullian both engaged it directly in the second century because it was still circulating widely. Matthew notes it was circulating at the time of his writing. It has never stopped circulating.

The two responses this Gospel holds side by side here are not finally about evidence. Both groups have access to the same empty tomb and the same missing body. One runs toward what it means. The other constructs a version of events that allows them to remain where they are. The resurrection does not force a conclusion. It demands a response. This is the response this season calls us to provide as well. As we celebrate this resurrection, we must remember the gift that it provided us – not just the event and miracle. We now have the opportunity to share this news with the world. We have all been called after the resurrection, the question is how we will individually respond.

Reflection Question

How are you responding to Jesus’ calling of you post resurrection?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹ On the first day of the week, Mary of Magdala came to the tomb early in the morning, while it was still dark, and saw the stone removed from the tomb. ² So she ran and went to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and told them, "They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and we don't know where they put him." ³ So Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb. ⁴ They both ran, but the other disciple ran faster than Peter and arrived at the tomb first; ⁵ he bent down and saw the burial cloths there, but did not go in. ⁶ When Simon Peter arrived after him, he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths there, ⁷ and the cloth that had covered his head, not with the burial cloths but rolled up in a separate place. ⁸ Then the other disciple also went in, the one who had arrived at the tomb first, and he saw and believed. ⁹ For they did not yet understand the scripture that he had to rise from the dead.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Mary comes in darkness and reads the empty tomb as a theft. Peter goes straight inside and sees everything. The beloved disciple enters last, sees the folded linen, and believes. Three people, the same evidence, three different responses. The burial cloths are lying there in an arrangement that no theft produces. The head cloth is folded separately, as if the body simply passed through what was wrapped around it and left the wrappings behind. This is John’s argument before any angel speaks or risen Jesus appears. The empty tomb, properly read, is enough. The beloved disciple believes before he understands. The faith arrives before the theology catches up. Sometimes that is exactly how it works.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Mary comes to the tomb while it is still dark. In John’s Gospel, darkness is never simply a time of day. Nicodemus came to Jesus by night. Judas walked out into the night after receiving the morsel at the Last Supper. The darkness Mary moves through on her way to the tomb is the last darkness of the old order.

She sees the stone removed and assumes the worst, that someone has taken the body. She does not consider resurrection or that He had risen. She runs to find Peter and another beloved disciple and her report is framed entirely as a theft, declaring that someone has taken the Lord. The resurrection has already occurred and its first witness reads it as a crime. No one was expecting this. The resurrection was not the projection of grieving people onto an ambiguous situation. It was an event that caught everyone by surprise, including the people who loved Jesus most.

Peter and the disciple run to the tomb and find the burial cloths lying there. Peter goes straight inside without hesitation. This is entirely consistent with how both we have seen Peter show up throughout the Gospel of John. The one disciple is attentive and reflective, present but sometimes at a threshold, yet Peter is always moving toward the center of things.

What Peter sees inside is described with a precision that slows this narrative down. The burial cloths are lying there. The cloth that had covered Jesus’ head is not with the other cloths. It is rolled up separately, in its own place. This is a big detail that tells us a deeper story. A stolen body is not unwrapped. Grave robbers in a hurry do not stop to fold linen. The cloths are not scattered in the chaos of someone carrying a body away. They are lying in an orderly arrangement, as if the body simply passed through them and left them behind.

There is a large contrast with what we saw when Lazarus emerged from his tomb. Lazarus was still bound in burial cloths and Jesus told the bystanders to untie him. Lazarus came out wrapped because he had been resuscitated. He would need his body again. He would die again. He required human help to be freed. Jesus leaves the cloths behind because He has no further need of them. He is not resuscitated; He is resurrected.

The un-named disciple enters after Peter, and John uses three different Greek words for seeing across this passage. When the beloved disciple first arrives, John uses blepō, ordinary physical sight. When Peter examines the scene, John uses theōreō, careful attentive observation. When the beloved disciple enters and the text says he saw and believed, John uses horaō, the verb he reserves throughout the Gospel for seeing that carries genuine perception and recognition. The three words map a progression from physical observation to attentive examination to the kind of seeing that produces faith.

John notes that they did not yet understand the scripture that He had to rise from the dead. This is not a failure of intelligence. Psalm 16 had said God would not abandon His holy one to see corruption. Hosea had spoken of being raised up on the third day. Isaiah’s suffering servant was promised that after making his life an offering he would see his offspring and prolong his days. The pattern was embedded in Israel’s scriptures across centuries, but in forms that required the event itself to unlock their meaning. The disciples who ran to that tomb had read those texts. They still did not see it coming.

The resurrection is the interpretive key that opens what the scriptures were pointing toward all along. Before it happened, even those closest to Jesus could not read the signs clearly enough to expect it. The beloved disciple believes first, and he believes before he understands. The faith arrives before the theology catches up. Understanding is not the condition of belief, in fact, sometimes it is the fruit of it.

Reflection Question

Is there something about the resurrection you are waiting to fully understand before you allow yourself to fully believe it?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹ After the sabbath, as the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb. ² And behold, there was a great earthquake; for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven, approached, rolled back the stone, and sat upon it. ³ His appearance was like lightning and his clothing was white as snow. ⁴ The guards were shaken with fear of him and became like dead men. ⁵ Then the angel said to the women in reply, "Do not be afraid! I know that you are seeking Jesus the crucified. ⁶ He is not here, for he has been raised just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. ⁷ Then go quickly and tell his disciples, 'He has been raised from the dead, and he is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him.' Behold, I have told you." ⁸ Then they went away quickly from the tomb, fearful yet overjoyed, and ran to announce this to his disciples. ⁹ And behold, Jesus met them on their way and greeted them. They approached, embraced his feet, and did him homage. ¹⁰ Then Jesus said to them, "Do not be afraid. Go tell my brothers to go to Galilee, and there they will see me."

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

The Sabbath ended and two women came to the tomb because they could not stay away. What they found was an empty tomb, an angel, and an earthquake. The stone was not rolled back to let Jesus out. He was already gone. It was rolled back so the witnesses could see. The angel called him the crucified one, present tense in its effect, because the resurrection does not erase the cross, it vindicates it. He was raised by the Father, not by his own effort. And then on the road, walking toward his disciples, Jesus called them his brothers. That is the shape of this love. It gathers back the ones who ran, names them brothers, and sends them to Galilee to begin again.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

The Sabbath has ended and two women come to the tomb, not with spices or a task, but simply because they cannot stay away. Mary Magdalene has been the continuous thread of faithful witness through everything that preceded this moment. She was at the cross, the burial, and now she is here. What greets them is an earthquake.

The Gospel of Matthew has already recorded one earthquake in the passion narrative, at the moment Jesus died, when the earth shook, rocks split, and tombs opened. This is the second. In Exodus 19, the mountain shook when God descended at Sinai. In Psalm 68, the earth quakes at the presence of God. This is not describing a geological event, it is signaling that what is happening here belongs to the same category as the direct interventions of God in Israel’s history, the kind that reshape everything that comes after.

The angel’s appearance is connects with what we see in the book of Daniel. In Daniel 7 and 10, the Ancient of Days and the heavenly messenger are described with faces like lightning and garments white as snow. The resurrection is not only a personal miracle, it’s a cosmic, eschatological event, the kind Daniel’s visions were pointing toward.

The stone is rolled back, but not to let Jesus out, He is already gone. The stone is moved so the women can see the empty tomb. That distinction matters more than it might seem. The resurrection does not require the stone. The witnesses do. The angel rolls it back and sits on it, stationed there to announce what has already occurred. The angel’s message carries two moments worth diving deeper into.

The first is the word the angel uses for Jesus. The crucified one. In Greek, ton estauromenon, a perfect passive participle describing a completed action with ongoing effects. The risen Jesus is still identified by the cross. The resurrection does not erase what happened on that Friday, rather, it vindicates it. The second is the construction used for the resurrection itself. He has been raised. Egerthē in Greek is a divine passive, meaning God raised Him. This is not self-resuscitation, but an act of the Father, locating the resurrection inside the life of the Trinity rather than presenting it as something Jesus accomplished for Himself.

The women leave the tomb carrying fear and great joy simultaneously. Jesus meets them on the road, not at the tomb. He appears while they are going to tell the others. They take hold of His feet and worship Him. The physical contact is not incidental. This is a bodily resurrection. He can be touched. The Gospel is not describing a vision or an impression, this is describing a person.

The message Jesus sends to the disciples carries the most unexpected word in the passage. He calls them His brothers. These people fled, denied Him, and not one of them is at the tomb. Yet, the first thing the risen Jesus calls them is brothers. Psalm 22 is the anchor here. It is the psalm Jesus quoted from the cross, the one that begins with My God, my God, why have you forsaken me. That same psalm ends with the vindicated sufferer proclaiming God’s name to his brothers in the great assembly. The desolation of the cross gives way to the brotherhood of the resurrection, and this Gospel signals that the arc has been completed.

He sends them to Galilee where He called the first disciples by the sea. The Gospel ends where it began, in the region the religious establishment had long dismissed, with the people who failed Him being gathered back and sent forward. The circle the Gospel of Matthew has been drawing since chapter 4 closes in the same place it opened, with the same unlikely people, now carrying news that changes everything.

We are blessed at what we have been invited into. It is clear that our perfection is impossible, just as it was impossible for those who followed Jesus the closest. What we know for certain is that He loves us. Deeply. He loves us despite our imperfections. He loves us despite the fact that we will fail to live up to the standard. He loves us so much that He became the Passover lamb to atone for all of our sins and imperfections, and still invites us to be near Him.

Reflection Question

Where can you let Jesus love you, despite the imperfections, and allow Him the opportunity to help heal you there?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹ When he had said this, Jesus went out with his disciples across the Kidron valley to where there was a garden, into which he and his disciples entered. ² Judas his betrayer also knew the place, because Jesus had often met there with his disciples. ³ So Judas got a band of soldiers and guards from the chief priests and the Pharisees and went there with lanterns, torches, and weapons. ⁴ Jesus, knowing everything that was going to happen to him, went out and said to them, "Whom are you looking for?" ⁵ They answered him, "Jesus the Nazorean." He said to them, "I AM." Judas his betrayer was also with them. ⁶ When he said to them, "I AM," they turned away and fell to the ground. ⁷ So he again asked them, "Whom are you looking for?" They said, "Jesus the Nazorean." ⁸ Jesus answered, "I told you that I AM. So if you are looking for me, let these men go." ⁹ This was to fulfill what he had said, "I have not lost any of those you gave me." ¹⁰ Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it, struck the high priest's slave, and cut off his right ear. The slave's name was Malchus. ¹¹ Jesus said to Peter, "Put your sword into its scabbard. Shall I not drink the cup that the Father gave me?"

¹² So the band of soldiers, the tribune, and the Jewish guards seized Jesus, bound him, ¹³ and brought him to Annas first. He was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year. ¹⁴ It was Caiaphas who had counseled the Jews that it was better that one man should die rather than the people.

¹⁵ Simon Peter and another disciple followed Jesus. Now the other disciple was known to the high priest, and he entered the courtyard of the high priest with Jesus. ¹⁶ But Peter stood at the gate outside. So the other disciple, the acquaintance of the high priest, went out and spoke to the gatekeeper and brought Peter in. ¹⁷ Then the maid who was the gatekeeper said to Peter, "You are not one of this man's disciples, are you?" He said, "I am not." ¹⁸ Now the slaves and the guards were standing around a charcoal fire that they had made, because it was cold, and were warming themselves. Peter was also standing there keeping warm.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Jesus crossed the Kidron, met the soldiers before they could find him, said I AM, and watched them fall to the ground. Then he surrendered on his own terms, twice, negotiating the release of his disciples before allowing himself to be taken. He was not overcome. He gave himself. Peter followed at a distance, stood at a fire in the wrong courtyard with the wrong people, and when a servant girl asked if he was one of Jesus’ disciples he said I am not. The same passage holds both men. Jesus declaring his identity under armed pressure. Peter dissolving his by a fire. John uses the same word for that fire as he uses for the fire where Jesus will later restore Peter on the shore.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Jesus crosses the Kidron valley and enters the garden. This draws similarity to what we see in 2 Samuel 15, when David fled Jerusalem across that same valley in tears during Absalom’s rebellion, weeping as he went into exile. It is the image of the suffering king driven from his city. Jesus is not fleeing though, but He is entering the same valley, and readers formed in Israel’s scriptures would feel the weight of that. Judas knew the place because Jesus had gone there often with His disciples. The betrayal uses intimacy as its instrument. The place of regular prayer and fellowship becomes the place of arrest.

Jesus does not wait to be found. He goes out to meet them and asks who they are looking for. When they answer Jesus of Nazareth, He says two words. Ego eimi. I AM. This is the absolute divine name, the same construction Jesus used in John 8 when He told the crowd that before Abraham came to be, I AM. It is the name God revealed to Moses at the burning bush in Exodus 3, the name before which Moses removed his sandals. The soldiers and Temple guards fall to the ground. A substantial armed force, equipped for a potential fight, prostrates itself at two words.

Jesus asks the question a second time and identifies Himself a second time. He is not simply surrendering. He is surrendering on His own terms, twice over, making clear that no one is taking Him. He is giving Himself. Before He does, He negotiates the release of the disciples, and this fulfills His own words from earlier in the Gospel, that He would lose none of those the Father had given Him. Even in the moment of arrest He is still shepherding, still gathering, still protecting.

Peter draws a sword and strikes Malchus, the high priest’s slave, cutting off his right ear. John is the only Gospel writer to name both the attacker and the victim, a detail of eyewitness precision. The rebuke from Jesus is immediate. Put the sword away. Peter’s instinct is understandable and entirely misses what is happening. Jesus has just knocked an armed cohort to the ground with His voice. He does not need a sword. More than that, a sword has no place in what is unfolding.

The cup saying that follows is the theological heart of the scene. Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me? In Isaiah 51, Jeremiah 25, and Ezekiel 23, the cup is the cup of God’s wrath, the weight of divine judgment poured out. The one who drinks it bears what human sin has accumulated before God. Jesus is telling Peter, and the reader, that what He is walking into is not a defeat to be prevented. It is something the Father has given Him, and He is going to drink it.

The passage closes at a charcoal fire in the high priest’s courtyard. A servant girl asks Peter whether he is one of Jesus’ disciples. His answer is ouk eimi. I am not. The contrast with the garden is structural and deliberate. Ego eimi and ouk eimi stand against each other across the passage. Jesus declaring His identity under armed pressure, and Peter denying his under a servant girl’s question, are placed in the same narrative frame so the reader cannot look away from the comparison.

John uses the same specific Greek word for charcoal fire, anthrakia, only one other time in his Gospel, in chapter 21 when Jesus prepares breakfast on the shore for the disciples after the resurrection and Peter is restored. The fire of denial and the fire of restoration are John’s deliberate bookends for Peter’s story.

Reflection Question

When the moment came to identify yourself with Jesus, did you say I AM or I am not?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹ Before the feast of Passover, Jesus knew that his hour had come to pass from this world to the Father. He loved his own in the world and he loved them to the end. ² The devil had already induced Judas, son of Simon the Iscariot, to hand him over. So, during supper, ³ fully aware that the Father had put everything into his power and that he had come from God and was returning to God, ⁴ he rose from supper and took off his outer garments. He took a towel and tied it around his waist. ⁵ Then he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples' feet and dry them with the towel around his waist. ⁶ He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, "Master, are you going to wash my feet?" ⁷ Jesus answered and said to him, "What I am doing, you do not understand now, but you will understand later." ⁸ Peter said to him, "You will never wash my feet." Jesus answered him, "Unless I wash you, you will have no inheritance with me." ⁹ Simon Peter said to him, "Master, then not only my feet, but my hands and head as well." ¹⁰ Jesus said to him, "Whoever has bathed has no need except to have his feet washed, for he is clean all over; so you are clean, but not all." ¹¹ For he knew who would betray him; for this reason, he said, "Not all of you are clean." ¹² So when he had washed their feet and put his garments back on and reclined at table again, he said to them, "Do you realize what I have done for you? ¹³ You call me 'teacher' and 'master,' and rightly so, for indeed I am. ¹⁴ If I, therefore, the master and teacher, have washed your feet, you ought to wash one another's feet. ¹⁵ I have given you a model to follow, so that as I have done for you, you should also do.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

He knew his hour had come and that the Father had placed all things in his hands. He knew Judas would hand him over before morning. He got up from the table, tied a towel around his waist, and washed every pair of feet in the room including the betrayer’s. The word John uses for loving them to the end is the same root as the word Jesus uses on the cross when he says it is finished. What begins here is completed there. The foot washing is not an illustration of a principle. It is the permanent shape of life in the community he is forming. The question it puts to every reader is not whether the image is moving. It is whether you are willing to take up the same posture toward the people in front of you, including the ones you already know will let you down.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Jesus knew His hour had come. We hear that He loved His own, which refers specifically to the disciples in the room. The phrase translated as to the end is eis telos in Greek, and it carries more than the English suggests. It means both to the end of time and to the fullest possible extent, to completion. John uses it here as the theological header for everything that follows in the passion narrative. The same root appears in John 19:30 when Jesus says it is finished, tetelestai, from the cross. The foot washing and the cross are framed by the same word. What begins here is completed there.

John also specifies that Jesus knew the Father had placed all things in His power and that He had come from God and was returning to God. This detail is placed before the foot washing deliberately. The one who rises from the table is not a servant who does not know his own worth. He holds all authority, knows His divine origin and His divine destination, and gets down on His knees with a towel anyway. The humility here is not born of low self-regard. It is sovereign love expressed from a position of total power.

Foot washing in the first century was among the lowest forms of service available. Roads were unpaved, feet were dirty, and the task belonged to the lowest slave in a household. Jewish tradition held that while a disciple could assist his teacher in many ways, washing feet was specifically exempted because of how degrading it was. Even a student was not expected to do what was reserved for slaves. Jesus is taking up the role that no one present would have been willing to perform, and John slows the narrative down to make sure the reader sees each step. He took off His garments, took a towel and tied it around His waist, and then poured the water. The deliberateness of the description is John’s way of ensuring nothing is glossed over.

Isaiah 52 introduces the suffering servant as one who will be exalted and lifted up, but whose path to exaltation runs through humiliation and service. The foot washing enacts the servant’s posture before the passion enacts the servant’s suffering. The early Church made this connection immediately and it is not difficult to see why.

Peter resists from a genuine place. The idea that the one he has confessed as the Christ should perform the act of a slave seems to contradict the proper ordering of things. Jesus cuts straight through it. Unless I wash you, you will have no inheritance with me. The word translated as inheritance is meros, covenant language meaning the share and portion belonging to someone counted among God’s people. To refuse what Jesus is offering is not humility. It is to place yourself outside the relationship entirely. Peter overcorrects immediately, asking for his hands and head as well. Jesus holds the line. The point is not maximum washing. The point is receiving what He offers in the way He offers it.

When Jesus declares the disciples clean He adds that not all of them are. He has washed every pair of feet at that table, including Judas’s. The physical act has been extended to the one who has already decided to hand Him over. The distinction between clean and not clean is not about who received the water, rather who has received what the washing points toward. Judas has been served by the one he will betray, and it has not changed what he has already chosen. The love is extended to him anyway.

The word Jesus uses when He tells the disciples He has given them a model to follow is hypodeigma, a technical term in the Greek Old Testament for an authoritative pattern given for imitation, not merely for admiration. He is not illustrating a principle and leaving it open for interpretation. He is establishing the permanent shape of life in the community He is forming. The inversion of status He has just enacted is not a one-time event to be remembered once a year. It is the ongoing posture of everyone who bears His name.

The question this passage puts to us is not whether we find the imagery of Jesus’ servitude moving. It is whether we are willing to take up the same posture toward the people in front of us, including those who may not deserve it, and including those we already know will let us down. That is what love looks like in the manner Jesus has shown. He knew it would not be easy, but this is a benchmark that has been set by the Lord Himself.

Reflection Question

Who in your life are you waiting to deserve your service before you give it?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

¹⁴ Then one of the Twelve, who was called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests ¹⁵ and said, “What are you willing to give me if I hand him over to you?” They paid him thirty pieces of silver, ¹⁶ and from that time on he looked for an opportunity to hand him over.

¹⁷ On the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the disciples approached Jesus and said, “Where do you want us to prepare for you to eat the Passover?” ¹⁸ He said, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The teacher says, “My appointed time draws near; in your house I shall celebrate the Passover with my disciples.”’” ¹⁹ The disciples then did as Jesus had ordered, and prepared the Passover.

²⁰ When it was evening, he reclined at table with the Twelve. ²¹ And while they were eating, he said, “Amen, I say to you, one of you will betray me.” ²² Deeply distressed at this, they began to say to him one after another, “Surely it is not I, Lord?” ²³ He said in reply, “He who has dipped his hand into the dish with me is the one who will betray me. ²⁴ The Son of Man indeed goes, as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born.” ²⁵ Then Judas, his betrayer, said in reply, “Surely it is not I, Rabbi?” He answered, “You have said so.”

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Judas went to them. No one recruited him. He opened the negotiation and accepted thirty pieces of silver, the contemptible wage of a rejected shepherd and the legal price of a dead slave. Meanwhile Jesus arranged the Passover with full knowledge of what was coming, using a word for his appointed time that meant the decisive hour everything had been moving toward. At the table he announced the betrayal and the disciples turned inward, each asking whether it could be themselves. When Judas finally asked, he called Jesus Rabbi where everyone else said Lord. That single word revealed where he had always stood. Jesus answered him with the truth and did not expose him. He loved him to the end. The door Judas walked through that night was one he opened himself.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Judas going to the chief priests is very deliberately stated. It shows that he is not being pressured into this, he is initiating and making a personal decision. He initiates the meeting and opens with a question that frames everything that follows. What are you willing to give me? He is assigning a market value to Jesus, and the negotiation is settled at thirty pieces of silver.

In Zechariah 11, the prophet serves as a shepherd over Israel and is paid thirty pieces of silver for his labor. God’s response to the payment is withering. The text calls it a contemptible sum and instructs Zechariah to throw it to the potter in the Temple, which he does. Matthew will return to this image in chapter 27 when Judas hurls the money back into the sanctuary and it is used to buy a potter’s field. There is also a second resonance underneath it. Exodus 21 fixes thirty pieces of silver as the legal compensation paid when a slave is accidentally killed. It is the baseline price of a human life under the law, the minimum the law required. The Son of God is valued at the contemptible wage of a rejected shepherd and the legal price of a dead slave.

From that point Judas watches and waits. The Greek word Matthew uses, eukairian, means a favorable moment, the right opening. This is not impulsive. He is being patient and deliberate, looking for just the moment to deliver.

Meanwhile Jesus instructs His disciples to prepare the Passover. He directs them to a certain man in the city without naming him, a deliberate concealment that ensures the location stays out of Judas’s knowledge until the meal is already underway. Jesus is not simply arranging dinner. The word He uses for His appointed time is kairos, which is not the ordinary Greek word for clock time. This word was used for a decisive, appointed moment, the hour that everything has been moving toward.

The Passover was the annual commemoration of the night in Egypt when the blood of a lamb on the doorposts caused death to pass over the households of Israel. Every element of the meal pointed backward to that deliverance and forward to the messianic redemption it anticipated. Paul, writing to the Corinthians, states it plainly: Christ our Passover has been sacrificed. The feast Jesus is about to transform is the feast that had always been pointing toward Him.

At the table, Jesus announces that one of those present will betray Him. They do not look around the room pointing at one another. Each one turns inward and asks whether it could be himself. The Greek carries the force of hoping the answer is no while leaving open the terrifying possibility that it might be yes. Matthew is presenting people who, confronted with the possibility of betrayal, examine themselves first. Jesus locates the betrayer as one who has dipped his hand in the dish with Him, drawing on Psalm 41 where the righteous sufferer names the wound of a close friend who shared bread turning against him.

When Judas asks whether it is him, he addresses Jesus as Rabbi, teacher, where every other disciple has used Lord. The distinction is a quiet revelation of where Judas has always stood. He has never moved past seeing Jesus as an impressive human figure, a great teacher. He has not made the confession the others have made. Jesus answers him with the same phrase He will use before the high priest and before Pilate. You have said so. It is a confirmation that places the weight of the truth on the one who already knows it.

The woe Jesus speaks over the betrayer carries the full weight of the prophetic tradition. Throughout the Old Testament and in the Gospel of Matthew, the woe formula signals the condition of someone who has placed themselves in catastrophic opposition to God’s purposes. It is a declaration of where this road leads, as Jesus says it would be better for that man never to have been born. The Church has never formally declared the final end of Judas. What Jesus does not do here is minimize the weight of what Judas is choosing.

Jesus shows us in this passage what love truly looks like. It also serves as a testament to the love He has for all of us to this day. No one in the room knew it would be Judas. Jesus knew and loved him still. We should aim to never betray God, but must always remember that there always a path back. The door is open, as are His arms. When we look at loving one another, it does not mean that we have to blindly accept negative actions. Jesus states clearly that it would have been better that the person was never born. That is a huge statement. Yet, the decision was Judas’s alone to make. Even as Peter would deny Jesus, He still loved him. This is a testament for us on love and forgiveness.

Reflection Question

Is there an area of your life where you have been assigning Jesus a value rather than giving him your whole allegiance?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Reclining at table with his disciples, Jesus was deeply troubled and testified,
"Amen, amen, I say to you, one of you will betray me."
The disciples looked at one another, at a loss as to whom he meant.
One of his disciples, the one whom Jesus loved,
was reclining at Jesus' side.
So Simon Peter nodded to him to find out whom he meant.
He leaned back against Jesus' chest and said to him,
"Master, who is it?"
Jesus answered,
"It is the one to whom I hand the morsel after I have dipped it."
So he dipped the morsel and took it and handed it to Judas,
son of Simon the Iscariot.
After Judas took the morsel, Satan entered him.
So Jesus said to him, "What you are going to do, do quickly."
Now none of those reclining at table realized why he said this to him.
Some thought that since Judas kept the money bag, Jesus had told him,
"Buy what we need for the feast,"
or to give something to the poor.
So Judas took the morsel and left at once. And it was night.

When he had left, Jesus said,
"Now is the Son of Man glorified, and God is glorified in him.
If God is glorified in him, God will also glorify him in himself,
and he will glorify him at once.
My children, I will be with you only a little while longer.
You will look for me, and as I told the Jews,
'Where I go you cannot come,' so now I say it to you."

Simon Peter said to him, "Master, where are you going?"
Jesus answered him,
"Where I am going, you cannot follow me now,
though you will follow later."
Peter said to him,
"Master, why can I not follow you now?
I will lay down my life for you."
Jesus answered, "Will you lay down your life for me?
Amen, amen, I say to you, the cock will not crow
before you deny me three times."

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Judas leaves into the dark and Peter declares he will lay down his life. Jesus knows both outcomes before either man moves. He stays at the table with both of them until the moment each one goes. He calls them his children. He washes their feet. He hands the morsel to the one who will hand him over. This is not a story about the failure of two men. It is a portrait of a love that does not withdraw when it knows what is coming. Peter’s denial is not the end of his story. But it begins with a man who had not yet learned the difference between what he felt capable of and what he actually was without the grace that would come later. The question this passage puts to every reader is not whether your intentions are sincere. It is whether you are honest about your need.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Jesus is at table with the people closest to Him in the world and He is deeply troubled. The Greek word used here, etarachthe, is the same word used when He stood at the tomb of Lazarus and when He spoke of His coming death earlier in John. It is not mild discomfort, rather a profound interior disturbance. He knows what is coming and He knows it is coming through someone sitting at that table with Him. He fully understands what He is about to endure and it is clearly unsettling, as it would be to anyone.

Jesus announces that “one of you will betray me.” The disciples look at one another, unable to land on an answer. The beloved disciple, reclining closest to Jesus, is the one Peter gestures to for help. When he asks, Jesus identifies the betrayer through the dipped morsel. At a Jewish meal, the host dipping a piece of bread and handing it to a guest was an act of honor. Jesus extends that gesture to Judas at the moment of identification. Even here, at the edge of betrayal, the offer is not withheld.

John tells us that after Judas took the morsel, Satan entered him. This is not a figure of speech in John’s telling. Judas has been moving toward this moment across the whole Gospel. John already told us he was a thief. The Adversary does not typically seize a person without a long preparation of smaller surrenders. What happens at the table is the completion of something that began much earlier.

Jesus sends him out with words that carry full knowledge of what Judas is about to do. What you are going to do, do quickly. The disciples hear errand instructions, but Jesus is speaking the language of sovereign purpose. The betrayal is not outside His control; He is not a victim of Judas. He is walking into what the Father has determined, and He is doing so with open eyes.

The moment Judas leaves, Jesus says now is the Son of Man glorified. The glorification of the Son of Man is a phrase rooted in Daniel 7, where the prophet sees a figure like a son of man approaching the Ancient of Days and receiving dominion and glory and a kingdom that will not pass away. Jesus is claiming that title and saying its fulfillment begins at this moment, set in motion by a betrayer walking into the dark.

He calls the remaining disciples “my children”, a tenderness that stands in sharp contrast to what has just happened. He tells them He is going somewhere they cannot follow, not yet. Peter pushes back immediately, as Peter does. Peter’s declaration is genuine and it is also completely uninformed by what Peter actually knows about himself. Jesus does not mock the intention, He simply tells Peter the truth. Before the night is over, before the rooster crows, Peter will deny Him three times.

There is something worth sitting with in the way this passage holds both Judas and Peter in the same frame and that is what it means to love like Jesus. One leaves to betray Him and the other declares he will die for Him. Jesus loves these two the same, up to the very end. He knows both outcomes and remains at the table with both men until the moment each one moves. Even as Judas leaves, no one is seen chasing him down to stop him. Jesus received Judas with such love that the disciples were unaware of the deception to come. Also, we see that He does not turn away from Peter after the prediction. Though the level of betrayal is not the same, Jesus knows that the one who loves him the most will also deny Him. He loves him still.

The application this passage presses toward is honest self-examination rather than general resolve. Peter’s problem was not lack of sincerity, it was that he had not yet learned the difference between what he felt capable of and what he was actually capable of without the grace that would come later. The cock crowing before morning is not the end of Peter’s story, as the rest of the Gospel makes clear. But it begins with a man who spoke before he knew himself. The question this passage puts to us is not whether we are loyal in our intentions. It is whether we are honest about our need.

Reflection Question

Where are you trusting your own loyalty more than you are trusting the grace that actually sustains it?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Six days before Passover Jesus came to Bethany,
where Lazarus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead.
They gave a dinner for him there, and Martha served,
while Lazarus was one of those reclining at table with him.
Mary took a liter of costly perfumed oil
made from genuine aromatic nard
and anointed the feet of Jesus and dried them with her hair;
the house was filled with the fragrance of the oil.
Then Judas the Iscariot, one of his disciples,
and the one who would betray him, said,
"Why was this oil not sold for three hundred days' wages
and given to the poor?"
He said this not because he cared about the poor
but because he was a thief and held the money bag
and used to steal the contributions.
So Jesus said, "Leave her alone.
Let her keep this for the day of my burial.
You always have the poor with you, but you do not always have me."

The large crowd of the Jews found out that he was there and came,
not only because of him, but also to see Lazarus,
whom he had raised from the dead.
And the chief priests plotted to kill Lazarus too,
because many of the Jews were turning away
and believing in Jesus because of him.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Six days before Passover, a woman poured a year’s wages on the feet of a man who was about to die, and he said she had done something that would be remembered wherever the Gospel was preached. Judas saw waste. Mary saw the moment. The Passover lamb was selected six days before the feast. Six days before Passover, in a house in Bethany, without fully understanding what she was doing, Mary got it exactly right. The question this passage leaves with every reader is not whether you are generous in general. It is whether you are present enough to recognize the moments that will not come again.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Six days before Passover, Jesus is in Bethany with the people who may know Him most intimately in John’s Gospel. Lazarus is at the table, the man Jesus raised from the dead, now simply sharing a meal. Mary takes a liter of pure nard, one of the most expensive substances in the ancient world, and pours it on His feet.

Nard was an aromatic oil imported from the Himalayan region, carried in sealed alabaster jars and worth roughly a year’s wages for a common laborer. This was the kind of thing a family preserved for a significant occasion. Mary breaks it open and uses all of it, not on His head as an honored guest might receive, but on His feet, the lowest act of service imaginable. She then loosens her hair in public to dry them. In first century Jewish culture, a woman letting down her hair in a mixed public setting carried serious social weight. It was considered immodest and was grounds for divorce in some rabbinic traditions. Mary is not performing a careful, calculated gesture. She is giving without any concern for what it costs her, and the house fills with the fragrance.

Judas objects immediately, framing the act as wasteful. Three hundred days’ wages could have gone to the poor. The objection sounds reasonable and as Judas was in charge of the finances would make sense that he was focused on the financial cost. John does not let it stand as reasonable and the Gospel tells us plainly that Judas did not care about the poor and that he was stealing from the money purse. The concern for the poor is a cover for a man who has already decided what Jesus is worth to him in practical terms.

What follows is one of the most misunderstood lines in the Gospels. You always have the poor with you, but you do not always have me. This is not a dismissal of concern for the poor. Jesus is drawing from Deuteronomy 15, where Moses tells Israel that the poor will never cease from the land and therefore the people must be openhanded toward them always. The command to care for the poor is permanent and ongoing. What Mary is doing can only be done now. Jesus is not setting up a hierarchy between charity and worship, rather telling Judas, and everyone present, that there are moments that will not come again and that Mary has recognized this one for what it is.

She is anointing Him for burial. Whether she fully understood that is not entirely clear from the text. What is clear is that Jesus receives it that way. The Passover lamb was selected six days before the feast. Six days before Passover, in a house in Bethany, a woman performs a burial anointing on a living man who would become the Passover lamb for the whole world.

The crowd coming to Bethany tells its own story. They are coming not only to see Jesus but to see Lazarus. A man who was dead and is now alive is a more powerful argument than anything the chief priests can counter with. People were beginning to follow Jesus in bigger groups and this was of concern to the chief priests and religious leaders that cared about power and control.

Mary gave the most costly thing she had at the moment it mattered most, without calculation, without concern for what it looked like, and without any indication that she expected anything in return. The question this passage puts to us is not whether we are generous in general. It is whether we are present enough to recognize the unrepeatable moments when everything we have is exactly what is called for.

Reflection Question

Is there something God is asking of you right now that you are calculating instead of giving?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Jesus stood before the governor, Pontius Pilate, who questioned him,
"Are you the king of the Jews?"
Jesus said, "You say so."
And when he was accused by the chief priests and elders,
he made no answer.
Then Pilate said to him,
"Do you not hear how many things they are testifying against you?"
But he did not answer him one word,
so that the governor was greatly amazed.

Now on the occasion of the feast
the governor was accustomed to release to the crowd
one prisoner whom they wished.
And at that time they had a notorious prisoner called Barabbas.
So when they had assembled, Pilate said to them,
"Which one do you want me to release to you,
Barabbas, or Jesus called Christ?"
For he knew that it was out of envy
that they had handed him over.
While he was still seated on the bench,
his wife sent him a message,
"Have nothing to do with that righteous man.
I suffered much in a dream today because of him."
The chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowds
to ask for Barabbas but to destroy Jesus.
The governor said to them in reply,
"Which of the two do you want me to release to you?"
They answered, "Barabbas!"
Pilate said to them,
"Then what shall I do with Jesus called Christ?"
They all said,
"Let him be crucified!"
But he said,
"Why? What evil has he done?"
They only shouted the louder,
"Let him be crucified!"
When Pilate saw that he was not succeeding at all,
but that a riot was breaking out instead,
he took water and washed his hands in the sight of the crowd,
saying, "I am innocent of this man's blood.
Look to it yourselves."
And the whole people said in reply,
"His blood be upon us and upon our children."
Then he released Barabbas to them,
but after he had Jesus scourged,
he handed him over to be crucified.

Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus inside the praetorium
and gathered the whole cohort around him.
They stripped off his clothes
and threw a scarlet military cloak about him.
Weaving a crown out of thorns, they placed it on his head,
and a reed in his right hand.
And kneeling before him, they mocked him, saying,
"Hail, King of the Jews!"
They spat upon him and took the reed
and kept striking him on the head.
And when they had mocked him,
they stripped him of the cloak,
dressed him in his own clothes,
and led him off to crucify him.

As they were going out, they met a Cyrenian named Simon;
this man they pressed into service
to carry his cross.

And when they came to a place called Golgotha
— which means Place of the Skull —,
they gave Jesus wine to drink mixed with gall.
But when he had tasted it, he refused to drink.
After they had crucified him,
they divided his garments by casting lots;
then they sat down and kept watch over him there.
And they placed over his head the written charge against him:
This is Jesus, the King of the Jews.
Two revolutionaries were crucified with him,
one on his right and the other on his left.
Those passing by reviled him, shaking their heads and saying,
"You who would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days,
save yourself, if you are the Son of God,
and come down from the cross!"
Likewise the chief priests with the scribes and elders mocked him and said,
"He saved others; he cannot save himself.
So he is the king of Israel!
Let him come down from the cross now,
and we will believe in him.
He trusted in God;
let him deliver him now if he wants him.
For he said, 'I am the Son of God.'"
The revolutionaries who were crucified with him
also kept abusing him in the same way.

From noon onward, darkness came over the whole land
until three in the afternoon.
And about three o'clock Jesus cried out in a loud voice,
"Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?"
which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"
Some of the bystanders who heard it said,
"This one is calling for Elijah."
Immediately one of them ran to get a sponge;
he soaked it in wine, and putting it on a reed,
gave it to him to drink.
But the rest said,
'Wait, let us see if Elijah comes to save him."
But Jesus cried out again in a loud voice,
and gave up his spirit.

Here all kneel and pause for a short time.

And behold, the veil of the sanctuary
was torn in two from top to bottom.
The earth quaked, rocks were split, tombs were opened,
and the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised.
And coming forth from their tombs after his resurrection,
they entered the holy city and appeared to many.
The centurion and the men with him who were keeping watch over Jesus
feared greatly when they saw the earthquake
and all that was happening, and they said,
"Truly, this was the Son of God!"

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Isaiah described him seven centuries before he arrived. The soldiers mocked him with the truth. A Gentile woman dreamed about him and tried to warn her husband. A Roman soldier watched him die and said what the disciples could not bring themselves to say. The cross looked like the end of the story. It was the story arriving at the moment it had always been moving toward. The veil tore. The earth shook. The barrier between God and humanity that the entire Temple system was built to manage was removed by the death of the one they crowned with thorns.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

What Matthew records here is the most consequential sequence of events in human history. Pilate’s question cuts to the heart of everything, asking Jesus if He is the king of the Jews? Jesus answers with a phrase that is neither confirmation nor denial. The chief priests and elders pile accusation upon accusation and He answers nothing. Isaiah 53 described the suffering servant who would be led like a lamb to slaughter, who would not open his mouth. Matthew’s Gospel is showing the fulfillment of a portrait Isaiah drew seven centuries earlier, of a figure who would bear the weight of the nation’s guilt without defense.

Pilate knows what is happening and we Matthew tells us plainly that he recognized envy as the motive behind the handover. His wife’s dream adds another layer. In the Old Testament, dreams carried divine weight. God warned the magi through a dream. He directed Joseph through dreams repeatedly. Now a Gentile woman receives a dream about a righteous man and sends an urgent warning to her husband. The warning goes unheeded. Pilate performs the public handwashing, a gesture drawn from Deuteronomy 21, where elders of a city washed their hands over an unresolved killing to declare their innocence. The crowd absorbs the declaration and answers back with words that carry the full weight of covenantal language. His blood be upon us and upon our children. In Israel’s covenant framework, to take blood upon oneself was to accept moral and legal responsibility for a death. It is important to note that while this is a significant passage in the Bible, Christianity does not read this as a collective curse on the Jewish people.

The mockery in the praetorium is a dark mirror of what Jesus actually is. The soldiers dress Him in scarlet, place a crown on His head, and kneel before Him shouting Hail, King of the Jews. Every element is intended as humiliation. Every element is accidentally true. He is the king. The crown, though made of thorns, sits on the head of the one to whom all authority in heaven and earth belongs.

At Golgotha, which means Place of the Skull, Jesus refuses the wine mixed with gall. Psalm 69 speaks of the righteous sufferer being given gall to drink. His death will be entered into with full consciousness and full will. The garments divided by lot fulfill Psalm 22 precisely, a psalm that opens with the very words Jesus will cry from the cross.

The darkness from noon to three in the afternoon is not incidental atmosphere. In the prophetic tradition, darkness in the middle of the day signaled divine judgment. Amos 8 warned of a day when God would make the sun go down at noon and darken the earth in broad daylight as a sign of judgment on Israel. We do know that scientifically, there was a lunar eclipse on Friday April 3, 33 AD.

Jesus cries out in Aramaic, quoting the opening line of Psalm 22. My God, my God, why have you forsaken me. This is not a moment of lost faith as some have tried to claim. The Psalms were not numbered. The way one would tell someone to look to a Psalm would be to quote the opening line, just as is done here. Psalm 22 is a psalm that moves from desolation to vindication, ending in the declaration that God has not hidden His face from the afflicted one but has heard his cry. Jesus is praying the psalm from inside the suffering it describes.

When He dies, three things happen at once. The Temple veil tears from top to bottom. The earth shakes. Tombs open. The veil separated the Holy of Holies, the innermost chamber where God’s presence dwelt, from the rest of the Temple. Only the high priest could enter it, and only once a year on the Day of Atonement. The barrier between God and humanity that the entire Temple system was built around has been removed by the death of the one the soldiers mocked as king. The earthquake and the opening of tombs signal that what is happening is not contained to one man on one cross.

The first confession of Jesus as Son of God in Matthew’s Passion does not come from a disciple or anyone who had followed Him. It comes from a Roman centurion who has just watched Him die. At the foot of the cross, in the mouth of a Gentile soldier, is the truth the whole narrative has been building toward.

Reflection Question

What would it mean for you to stand at the foot of that cross today and say what the centurion said?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Many of the Jews who had come to Mary
and seen what Jesus had done began to believe in him.
But some of them went to the Pharisees
and told them what Jesus had done.
So the chief priests and the Pharisees
convened the Sanhedrin and said,
“What are we going to do?
This man is performing many signs.
If we leave him alone, all will believe in him,
and the Romans will come
and take away both our land and our nation.”
But one of them, Caiaphas,
who was high priest that year, said to them,
“You know nothing,
nor do you consider that it is better for you
that one man should die instead of the people,
so that the whole nation may not perish.”
He did not say this on his own,
but since he was high priest for that year,
he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for the nation,
and not only for the nation,
but also to gather into one the dispersed children of God.
So from that day on they planned to kill him.

So Jesus no longer walked about in public among the Jews,
but he left for the region near the desert,
to a town called Ephraim,
and there he remained with his disciples.

Now the Passover of the Jews was near,
and many went up from the country to Jerusalem
before Passover to purify themselves.
They looked for Jesus and said to one another
as they were in the temple area, “What do you think?
That he will not come to the feast?”

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

The Sanhedrin did not dispute the signs or argue the witnesses were unreliable. They gathered in a room, acknowledged that Jesus was working, and asked what believing in him would cost them politically. Caiaphas gave them a way out. One man dies, the nation survives, the institution holds. What he did not know was that his words were truer than his intentions. One man would die for the nation, and not only for the nation, but to gather into one the scattered children of God. The very death being plotted in that room would accomplish what Isaiah and Ezekiel had been pointing toward for centuries. The question this passage presses on every reader is the same one the Sanhedrin was really asking. Not whether the evidence is sufficient. But what believing would cost you.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

This happens immediately following the raising of Lazarus, arguably the most powerful sign Jesus performed. Many who witnessed it believed, but even then there were still those that did not and the group remained divided. With this, some go straight to the Pharisees. Everyone witnessed the same sign, but what each person does with it is their own.

The Sanhedrin convenes and the conversation is remarkably candid. They do not dispute the signs or argue that the witnesses are unreliable. Their concern is primarily political in nature. The issue they are facing is that if they leave Him alone, everyone will believe in Him and Rome will interpret a popular messianic movement as a threat. The fear is not irrational and Rome had suppressed such movements before and done so with overwhelming force.

The Sanhedrin’s problem is not that Jesus is a fraud, rather that He is working and they cannot control what that means for their position. An interesting point here is that many believed the new king would be a great warrior and were surprised to see Jesus. Here, we see the Sanhedrin afraid that this would cause a movement that would threaten Rome, something Jesus was doing through peace, love, and showing the glory of God. Caiaphas cuts through the deliberation with brutal pragmatism. He frames the decision around the view that it is better for one man to die than for the whole nation to perish.

In Israel, the high priest carried a mediating function between God and the people, standing before God on behalf of the nation and bearing that weight throughout his office. Part of that role, in Israel’s history, included moments where the office itself became a channel for divine communication, not because the person holding it was holy, but because of what the office represented before God. Caiaphas is doing political calculus, but the words coming out of his mouth are carrying a far larger truth.

What he accidentally announces is the theological center of the entire Gospel. One man will die for the nation, and not only for the nation, but to gather into one the dispersed children of God. That phrase reaches back to Isaiah and Ezekiel, who spoke of a day when God would gather His scattered people from every corner of the earth and reconstitute them as one. The very death being plotted in that room will accomplish what those prophecies were pointing toward, on a scale extending far beyond Israel.

From that day the decision is made. Jesus withdraws to Ephraim near the desert and remains with His disciples, moving according to the Father’s timing rather than the pressure of His opponents. The passage closes with Passover approaching, the annual commemoration of the night in Egypt when the blood of a lamb on the doorposts caused death to pass over Israel’s households, and crowds wondering aloud whether Jesus will come to the feast. The feast they are gathering to observe is about to become the reality it was always pointing toward.

The application this passage presses toward is specific. The Sanhedrin had more evidence than most people will ever have and it was not enough, because the question they were asking was not whether Jesus was who He claimed to be. The question they were asking was what belief in Him would cost them. That is still the question. What this Gospel demands is not general openness to faith. It is an honest reckoning with what we are protecting that keeps us from following the evidence where it leads.

Reflection Question

What are you protecting that keeps you from following the evidence about Jesus where it leads?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

The Jews picked up rocks to stone Jesus.
Jesus answered them, “I have shown you many good works from my Father.
For which of these are you trying to stone me?”
The Jews answered him,
“We are not stoning you for a good work but for blasphemy.
You, a man, are making yourself God.”
Jesus answered them,
“Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, ‘You are gods”‘?
If it calls them gods to whom the word of God came,
and Scripture cannot be set aside,
can you say that the one
whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world
blasphemes because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?
If I do not perform my Father’s works, do not believe me;
but if I perform them, even if you do not believe me,
believe the works, so that you may realize and understand
that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.”
Then they tried again to arrest him;
but he escaped from their power.

He went back across the Jordan
to the place where John first baptized, and there he remained.
Many came to him and said,
“John performed no sign,
but everything John said about this man was true.”
And many there began to believe in him.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

Jesus had already shown them though the works He had done. the signs were witnessed and the testimony was on the record. When the crowd reached for stones again He pointed at what they had already seen and asked them to explain it. The works testified. John testified. The Father testified. At some point the question stops being about evidence and starts being about willingness. That is as true today as it was then. John simply saw Jesus clearly and said so, and that was enough to carry people all the way to belief. We are not all called to dramatic signs. We are called to accurate witness. If what we say about Jesus is true and we live accordingly, that testimony will carry further than we can measure. It was enough then. It is enough now.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

Here is the revised version with the tweaks applied:

This Gospel comes right after Jesus’ declaration that He and the Father are one. The crowd has already reached for stones once in this chapter and started to pursue Jesus. Each time Jesus makes a claim that cannot be absorbed into their existing categories, the response escalates. The crowd is increasingly recognizing the weight of His claims, and many are rejecting them. In this moment, Jesus meets them with a question rather than a defense.

Jesus makes the point that He has already shown them so many good works. He asks why they still seek to stone Him. He has already been known for healings and signs, numerous works already witnessed by those present. He is not asking them to take His word alone. He is pointing to what has already been demonstrated and asking them to account for it. The group clarifies that the issue they have is not with the fact that He has done glorious things, it is that He, a man, was putting Himself equal with God.

Jesus’ response draws from Psalm 82:6, where God addresses figures exercising delegated divine authority. Psalm 82 opens with God rendering judgment against unjust judges. These were human rulers and magistrates carrying out a divine mandate. In the Psalm God says “I declare: ‘Gods you are, children of the Most High, all of you; yet like humans you shall die, and fall like any prince.’” Jesus is using this Scripture against the charge. If the Old Testament applies the word gods to figures exercising delegated divine authority, then how can the charge of blasphemy stand against the one the Father personally consecrated and sent into the world? He is not claiming less than those judges. He is claiming something far greater, and the very Scriptures they are appealing to cannot support the charge they are bringing.

The phrase “whom the Father has consecrated and sent” carries significant weight. The Greek word for consecrated, hegiastai (ἡγίασται), draws from the same sanctification language used for the Temple and its vessels, things set apart entirely for God’s purposes. Jesus is claiming a unique and total consecration by the Father, setting apart His position from that of any judge, prophet, or prior figure in Israel’s history. He then returns to His works again as a final appeal.

The point Jesus is making is that the works themselves testify. He is showing them that through these works they can see that it is true that the Father is in Him and He is in the Father. This mutual indwelling is the theological heart of what Jesus places as the conclusion of His argument.

They attempt to arrest Him and He escapes and withdraws across the Jordan. Even at this point, people come to Him and the testimony they offer is not about signs or miracles. They are testifying that John performed no signs like Jesus, but everything John said about Him was true. Their belief is grounded in the reliability of prior testimony. They believed John and followed that witness to its conclusion and believed.

There is an application here that runs in two directions. The first is that the works of God in our lives are themselves a testimony. If we look at the miracles that have happened, we can see Him at hand. A quick Google search reveals countless miracles. While there will always be those that disagree, there are miracles that have been documented with tens of thousands of witnesses! The second is that faithful witness, even without dramatic signs, carries people toward Jesus. John performed no miracle, but his testimony was true and it was enough. He truly saw Jesus. He knew Him. We are not all called to spectacular demonstration. We are called to accurate witness. If what we say about Jesus is true and we live accordingly, that testimony will carry weight beyond what we can measure.

Reflection Question

Where in your life has God already shown you something, and what have you done with what you have seen?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Jesus said to the Jews:
“Amen, amen, I say to you,
whoever keeps my word will never see death.”
So the Jews said to him,
“Now we are sure that you are possessed.
Abraham died, as did the prophets, yet you say,
‘Whoever keeps my word will never taste death.’
Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died?
Or the prophets, who died?
Who do you make yourself out to be?”
Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is worth nothing;
but it is my Father who glorifies me,
of whom you say, ‘He is our God.’
You do not know him, but I know him.
And if I should say that I do not know him,
I would be like you a liar.
But I do know him and I keep his word.
Abraham your father rejoiced to see my day;
he saw it and was glad.”
So the Jews said to him,
“You are not yet fifty years old and you have seen Abraham?”
Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you,
before Abraham came to be, I AM.”
So they picked up stones to throw at him;
but Jesus hid and went out of the temple area.

Learn to Pray

Today’s Focus

The crowd had access to the same words every reader of this passage has. Some believed while other reached for stones. The difference was not information, rather how each person was willing to do with the claim being made. Jesus did not soften it or walk it back, holding firm, “before Abraham came to be, I AM.” That is either the most important truth you will ever encounter or it is blasphemy. The question John places before every reader is the same one the crowd faced that day in the Temple. Who do you say that He is?

Subscribe now

In the Margins

This incident takes place inside the Temple during a sustained confrontation between Jesus and the religious leaders of Jerusalem. It has been escalating for some time by the time we get here. This exchange reaches its climax here, moving from what started as a theological debate and now ends with the group reaching for stones. Jesus is making claims that leave no middle ground, people would have been in a place where they had to accept or deny what they were hearing.

This Gospel opens with Jesus telling the group, “whoever keeps my word will never see death.” They hear this at a literal level, and believe this to mean actual life and death. They look to Abraham and the prophets who died. Knowing these figures walked faithfully with God, and having still died, they could not understand what Jesus was saying, they missed Him pointing to the spiritual life. This spiritual separation from God, the final and ultimate consequence of rejecting the one the Father has sent.

Their question, “Who do you make yourself out to be?” drives this passage. They intend it as a challenge. Jesus does not answer their question directly, rather redirects it to the Father. The distinction Jesus draws is pointed. They say “He is our God” but Jesus tells them plainly: you do not know him. This is not a minor correction. In the framework we see, to claim the Father while rejecting the Son is to reveal that one does not truly know the Father at all. Knowing the Father and knowing Jesus are inseparable throughout this Gospel. The claim to possess God while rejecting the one he sent cannot hold.

Then Jesus says something that stops the conversation entirely. “Abraham your father rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad.” The crowd’s response is understandable. They are still reading him in purely human terms, measuring him by a human lifespan. That is precisely the misunderstanding Jesus has been diagnosing throughout this chapter.

This passage’s climax comes with Jesus saying, “before Abraham came to be, I AM.” The Greek is ego eimi (ἐγώ εἰμι) and it is the same construction that echoes the divine self-identification in Exodus 3:14, where God reveals his name to Moses at the burning bush. This resonance would be unmistakable to anyone formed in the Jewish scriptures. Jesus is not saying that he existed before Abraham in the way an elderly person existed before a younger one. He uses the present tense in a way that transcends normal human categories of time, signaling not just pre-existence but divine identity. This is why the crowd reaches for stones immediately. They understand it as a claim that crosses into blasphemy within their framework. Under Leviticus 24:16, blasphemy was punishable by stoning. They are not overreacting by their own legal standards. They are responding to what they heard as a claim to be God.

This passage asks us directly, who do we say that Jesus is? The crowd had access to the same words. Some believed what they heard while others reached for stones. The difference was not information, everyone heard the same message. It was what each person was willing to do with the claim being made. Jesus did not soften the statement or walk it back either. He was clear and firm, “before Abraham came to be, I AM.” That claim is either the most important truth we will ever encounter or it is grounds for the crowd’s response. There is no comfortable middle position available. What we do with it is the question John is placing before every reader, then and now.

Reflection Question

Have you settled the question of who Jesus is, or are you still standing in the crowd deciding what to do with what you have heard?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

The angel Gabriel was sent from God
to a town of Galilee called Nazareth,
to a virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph,
of the house of David,
and the virgin’s name was Mary.
And coming to her, he said,
“Hail, full of grace! The Lord is with you.”
But she was greatly troubled at what was said
and pondered what sort of greeting this might be.
Then the angel said to her,
“Do not be afraid, Mary,
for you have found favor with God.
Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son,
and you shall name him Jesus.
He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High,
and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father,
and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever,
and of his Kingdom there will be no end.”
But Mary said to the angel,
“How can this be,
since I have no relations with a man?”
And the angel said to her in reply,
“The Holy Spirit will come upon you,
and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.
Therefore the child to be born
will be called holy, the Son of God.
And behold, Elizabeth, your relative,
has also conceived a son in her old age,
and this is the sixth month for her who was called barren;
for nothing will be impossible for God.”
Mary said, “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord.
May it be done to me according to your word.”
Then the angel departed from her.

Today’s Focus

God did not send his angel to the Temple or the palace. He sent him to an unmarked town, to an unknown girl, and he waited for her answer. Mary did not have the full picture. She had a word and a promise and a God she trusted with both. She said yes before she understood what yes would cost. That is the faith this passage commends. Not clarity before commitment, but availability before understanding. Nothing will be impossible for God. That was true in Nazareth. It is still true now.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

This passage is one where heaven meets earth in the most intimate and deliberate way. The Angel Gabriel does not appear to a queen or a priest or a political leader. He is sent to an unmarried young woman in Nazareth, a town of no particular distinction. Galilee was considered a peripheral region, not a center of religious or political power. God’s chosen entry point into human history is not the Temple, not Rome, not the palace of Herod, rather a young woman in an overlooked town.

Gabriel’s greeting, “Hail, full of grace,” is dense with theological weight. The Greek kecharitomene (κεχαριτωμένη) is a perfect passive participle, meaning one who has been and remains filled with grace. It is not a general compliment, it’s a statement about Mary’s condition before God. The passive construction indicates that this fullness of grace is something she has received, not something she has earned. Mary’s response is not pride or confidence. She is troubled and pondering. The Greek dielogizeto (διελογίζετο) means to reason through carefully, to turn something over in one’s mind. She is thinking seriously about what this greeting means before she has even heard what is being asked of her.

The angel’s message moves quickly from greeting to announcement to promise. Jesus will be great. He will be called Son of the Most High. He will sit on the throne of David his father. He will rule over the house of Jacob forever. Each phrase draws directly from the Old Testament promises. 2 Samuel 7 contains Nathan’s oracle to David in which God promises that a descendant of David will rule in a kingdom with no end. Gabriel is telling Mary that her son is the fulfillment of that covenant. The promise made to David roughly a thousand years earlier is about to be fulfilled in her womb.

Mary’s question is not a refusal. It is a sincere request for understanding. She does not doubt that God can do this. She genuinely does not understand how it will happen given her circumstances. Gabriel’s answer does not provide a biological explanation, but a theological one. The Holy Spirit will come upon her and the power of the Most High will overshadow her. The language of overshadowing recalls the cloud of God’s presence that overshadowed the Tabernacle in Exodus 40:35. Mary herself becomes the dwelling place of God’s presence. Gabriel seals the answer with the statement that grounds the whole passage: nothing will be impossible for God.

Mary’s response is the model of faith. “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word.” There is no hesitation recorded, no request for additional confirmation, no negotiation. She accepts the will of God with full awareness that she does not entirely understand it. She identifies herself as a servant. The word doule (δούλη) means one in complete service to another. She is not surrendering reluctantly. She is placing herself entirely at God’s disposal.

This passage calls us to sit with Mary’s example. There will be moments in our lives where God’s plan does not match our expectations or our understanding of how things should unfold. Mary did not have the full picture. She had a word from God and she trusted it. We are not promised clarity before faith. We are invited to offer the same response she did, to say that whatever God asks, we are available. Nothing will be impossible for God. That promise was true in Nazareth that day, and it remains true for whatever we are carrying now.

Reflection Question

Is there something God has been asking of you that you have been waiting to understand before you say yes?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.

Jesus said to the Pharisees:
“I am going away and you will look for me,
but you will die in your sin.
Where I am going you cannot come.”
So the Jews said,
“He is not going to kill himself, is he,
because he said, ‘Where I am going you cannot come’?”
He said to them, “You belong to what is below,
I belong to what is above.
You belong to this world,
but I do not belong to this world.
That is why I told you that you will die in your sins.
For if you do not believe that I AM,
you will die in your sins.”
So they said to him, “Who are you?”
Jesus said to them, “What I told you from the beginning.
I have much to say about you in condemnation.
But the one who sent me is true,
and what I heard from him I tell the world.”
They did not realize that he was speaking to them of the Father.
So Jesus said to them,
“When you lift up the Son of Man,
then you will realize that I AM,
and that I do nothing on my own,
but I say only what the Father taught me.
The one who sent me is with me.
He has not left me alone,
because I always do what is pleasing to him.”
Because he spoke this way, many came to believe in him.

Today’s Focus

Jesus stands in the Temple and uses the divine name to describe himself. The crowd asks who he is. The answer had just been given and they missed it. That is the passage in a sentence. The inability to hear what Jesus is saying is not simply a failure of information. It is a failure of origin, those who belong to what is below cannot perceive what comes from above. Jesus then points to the cross as the moment when recognition will finally arrive. Many believe anyway, on the word alone, with no sign required. The word is enough for those who can receive it.

Subscribe now

In the Margins

This passage continues the Temple confrontation during and after the Feast of Tabernacles that has been running since John 7. Jesus has already declared himself the light of the world (8:12), been challenged on his self-testimony (8:13), and defended his witness by appeal to the Father (8:18). The confrontation is intensifying with each exchange.

Throughout the Gospel, Jesus’ statements are consistently misread in purely material terms: Nicodemus misreads being born again as physical birth, the Samaritan woman misreads living water as well water, the crowd misreads the bread of life as physical bread. Here they misread departure to the Father as suicide.

A phrase worth fully understanding is when Jesus says, “You belong to what is below, I belong to what is above,” hymeis ek tōn katō este, egō ek tōn anō eimi (ὑμεῖς ἐκ τῶν κάτω ἐστέ, ἐγὼ ἐκ τῶν ἄνω εἰμί). The preposition ek means from or out of. This denotes origin. Jesus is not describing a moral hierarchy. He is describing a difference in origin and nature. The Pharisees originate from below, from the created order. Jesus originates from above, from the uncreated divine reality. Jesus clarifies this even more telling them that they belong to this world, while He does not. To belong to this world in John’s sense is to operate within a framework that cannot perceive or receive what comes from above. This is a statement about origin, allegiance, and perception.

When Jesus says “I AM,” is the absolute “I AM.” The sentence as Jesus constructs it is deliberately incomplete by Greek grammatical standards, which signals to any Greek reader that the completion is not a predicate but the divine name itself. This directly calls back to Exodus 3:14, where God tells Moses “I AM WHO I AM” and then shortens it to “ehyeh,” “I AM.” It occurs again in Isaiah 43:10, with God declaring “I AM.” The incomplete phrasing here is why the crowd would have followed this up with questioning who He was, not realizing He was making the ultimate statement of identity.

Jesus talks about being lifted up, which is directly foreshadowing His crucifixion. In this there is a double meaning from the Greek use, where it can mean to literally lift up or to exalt. It also draws on Numbers 21:8-9, where Moses “lifts up” a bronze serpent on a pole and all who look at it are healed. Jesus on the cross follows the same pattern, where He is lifted up and then exalted, bringing healing to all who look upon him in faith.

Not everyone believes when they hear Jesus make this declaration. This has come after countless miracles and a reputation of mercy and love. It should be no surprise that we will encounter non-believers everywhere we go. We see this time and time again throughout scriptures and it leaves us with a choice. As we spread the Gospel, we will encounter those who do not believe. When you try to spread the word of God, the devil is likely nearby. We cannot take this personally. If Jesus makes bold declarations, performs countless miracles and does not convince everyone, we should not expect to do better. Our goal should be focused on loving God and spreading the word as much as we can. When we do this, even if we cannot expect everyone to believe, we can pray that just as people believed with Jesus’ declaration, they will believe at hearing the word of the Lord.

Reflection Question

Is there something Jesus has said clearly that you have been hearing in purely material terms, missing what he is actually saying?

Share

A Small Invitation

If this reflection helped you, consider sharing it with someone who may benefit from hearing this message.